The only problem was he refused to control the price of grain, with the result that it skyrocketed beyond what the road builders could afford.
Your reaction The British Empire grew at a time when European countries were all competing for world domination. So much so, that even now we are left bewildered as to discuss the topic at hand. However, I have never met such warm welcoming and tolerant people who taught and showed me so much.
Or did it leave nothing more than a crippling legacy that would haunt its former colonies to this day? Though it benefited their needs for exporting the cotton and other produce and for shifting of their troops for defence as per the needs, the railways have helped in unifying the country; and has now become the single largest employer.
So, for every example of a heroic attempt to bridge a cultural gap and produce true illumination, there are a handful of counterexamples of vested interests producing politically motivated and biased translations.
And our instinctive denial of economic freedom — evident in how India is lagging behind in economic freedom index despite great efforts towards reforms — is also a hangover of colonial times. Why did Britishers leave India? Further, it redefined the social and economic attitudes of the colonized and it will be a long time before they would be able shed it to realize the uniqueness of their social, cultural and economic standing.
The British were a minority in this land even in their heyday, so they had to rule mostly by means of agile public relations as much as military might.
The driving force behind it was an economic one.
The British displaced existing despots, and did so with the support of significant numbers of the local populations. To add insult to injury, the colonisers saw themselves as superior to those they colonised. Of thepeople detained during the decade-long Emergency, only a handful were anything other than ethnic Chinese.
Samyuktha, India Britain was the biggest robber of the 18th century. Whatever the collective outcome of British role in the area of textual translations, it must be remembered that any colonialism is a poisoned chalice. I come from Pakistan, and believe that the imperialism was a blessing in disguise.
British even gave Mysore to a Hindu king after defeating Tipu. Some will say that the industrialization and modernization would occur automatically even without the Britons. India was unified under the British crown. Once in a village, you lost all right to freedom and privacy.
The great rail system that they gave us was built on the blood and sweat of hundreds of thousands of "dispensable brown men". An educated and conscious middle class was generated as a process. Read a selection of your comments below. Some will say the British raj was actually good and some will totally contradict.
Suzerainty over princely states, some of the largest and most important, was exercised in the name of the British Crown by the central government of British India under the Viceroy ; the remaining approximately states were dependents of the provincial governments of British India under a Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, or Chief Commissioner as the case might have been.The idea that British rule over India was a force for good is not uncommon in Britain and even in certain sections of westernised Indian elite.
and also works in a research department at Oxford University, said that British Raj greatly benefited the ruled nations and The main reason was not bad weather or natural causes but rather the.
Feb 04, · The big myth of the British Empire is that it nobly withdrew from its colonies when it realized the days of Imperialism were over.
Yet one look at Cyprus proves the myth to be just a feel-good fairy tale. British Raj: The good, the bad and the ugly - Closer to the country's 70th year of Independence, personalities from diverse walks of life share their thoughts on British rule in.
Aug 02, · India was under the British rule for almost years. There is a controversy whether the impact of the British Raj was good or evil for wine-cloth.coms: 9. Was British Colonialism Good or Bad for India? They were better than the French, at least. Max Fisher.
Nov 17, Ideal Is No Colonialism, But. Jan 15, · History: Was the British Raj good for India?
or did it have any negative impacts? 1 following. 4 answers 4. Report Abuse. Are you sure you want to delete this answer? While foreign domination is thought of as bad for a peoples, the influx of new ideas often help lift a people out of doldrums. This is historically the wine-cloth.com: Resolved.Download